NONOBVIOUSNESS:
35 USC: 103(a)When Professor Tal added these bullets, he asked us for obviousness means. I raised my hand and gave the informal answer of what obviousness means, an answer similar to what I've said in this blog and in my YouTube video. I also cited the example of the bottle cap - you can the red to a green bottle cap. That is obvious. Unless the green bottle cap has a very genuine/super important new purpose that the red bottle cap does not have. Professor Tal said that this is the colloquial way of describing obviousness but it is not a good definition.
Like the novelty requirement, but trickier
Novelty requirement looks to a single piece of prior art
Nonobviousness requirement looks at multiple pieces of
prior art
Novel means new
Non-obvious means that a person having ordinary skills in the art wouldn't have easily thought of it given the plurality of prior art
So what is the correct definition??

No comments:
Post a Comment